<Comment deleted by user>
@Hedgehog1963 said in #28:
> I have, however, watched a lot of their content. I used to like the format of "banter blitz" and I remain a fan of Peter Svidler and Anna Rudolf as amiable personalities. Their coverage of the World Championships with Gustaffson and Svidler were the best around at one time.
Their chess events coverage in French language was much better than chessdotcom's. Definitively a big loss to the chess world.
> I have, however, watched a lot of their content. I used to like the format of "banter blitz" and I remain a fan of Peter Svidler and Anna Rudolf as amiable personalities. Their coverage of the World Championships with Gustaffson and Svidler were the best around at one time.
Their chess events coverage in French language was much better than chessdotcom's. Definitively a big loss to the chess world.
@PolishHussars2009 said in #17:
> monopoly
You apparently need around 60 or 70% of a market to get a high degree of overall control and then for example raise prices successfully. With this consideration in mind, I am hopping that the ChessBase site despite some sleazy behaviour continues to stay independent and stays alive to help oppose the sweet CheeseBOTbomb people.
PS: How can we introduce / inveigle gambling onto a chess site?
> monopoly
You apparently need around 60 or 70% of a market to get a high degree of overall control and then for example raise prices successfully. With this consideration in mind, I am hopping that the ChessBase site despite some sleazy behaviour continues to stay independent and stays alive to help oppose the sweet CheeseBOTbomb people.
PS: How can we introduce / inveigle gambling onto a chess site?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.